Trump-Trudeau tiff is the latest in a history of President-PM disputes

File 20180616 85830 1pa46va.jpg?ixlib=rb 1.1
Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau meets with U.S. President Donald Trump at the G7 leaders summit on June 8, 2018. Trump sent angry tweets about his Canadian host shortly after the summit ended.
THE CANADIAN PRESS/Justin Tang

Ron Stagg, Ryerson University

Canadians were puzzled by Donald Trump’s suggestion that national security concerns required tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum — and then stunned even more by the U.S. president’s personal attacks on Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in the aftermath of the G7 summit.

What perhaps was more bewildering was Trump’s threat to punish Canada for Trudeau’s rather mild rebuke about the tariffs. Even some Americans were so shocked that they leapt to the defence of Canada.

The short-term effect of this one-sided confrontation is causing a drop in value of the Canadian dollar, and calling into question the success of NAFTA talks with a belligerent U.S. administration.

While this very public spat is perhaps the most publicized disagreement between an American president and a Canadian prime minister, there have been notable confrontations in the past.

JFK and Dief disliked each other

In the modern era, perhaps the spat that came closest in tone to the current one was between John F. Kennedy and John Diefenbaker, only in that case both sides were confrontational.

The reasons for the animosity were numerous. Diefenbaker, from an earlier generation, came from a modest background. He saw Kennedy as a spoiled rich kid. Kennedy felt that Diefenbaker, who spoke in language suited to the 19th century and tended to lecture, boring and pedantic.

The Canadian was an anglophile who regarded the United States as a brash upstart which was a danger to the Canadian economy. The late 1950s saw a surge in American investment in Canadian natural resources. The Kennedy administration wanted Canada to cut ties with post-revolutionary Cuba, which it had refused to do, and to accept nuclear weapons under American control, stationed on Canadian soil.

Archive video from the Canadian Broadcast Corp. on U.S. President John Kennedy’s visit to Ottawa in 1961.

Kennedy visited Ottawa in 1961, hoping to pressure Ottawa on these and other issues. He pronounced Diefenbaker’s name incorrectly, which offended the thin-skinned prime minister, and accidentally left behind a memo listing ways the Canadians could be “pushed” to accept the American position.

When the memo was found, this only confirmed Diefenbaker’s worst ideas about the Americans. Reportedly, Kennedy had scrawled “SOB” in the margin, no doubt in frustration. Kennedy’s description of Diefenbaker to his confidants was, as they say, not suitable for a family newspaper.

Another irritant for Diefenbaker was Kennedy’s friendly relationship with Diefenbaker’s opponent, the Liberal leader Lester Pearson. The Liberals had changed their position to one of accepting nuclear weapons. They got along so well that the Kennedy administration assisted the Liberals to defeat Diefenbaker in 1963 by sending Kennedy’s personal pollster, an early expert in the field, to assess what the public wanted.

Did LJB grab Pearson by the lapels?

However, Pearson had a falling out with Kennedy’s successor, Lyndon Johnson. Though Pearson’s government sold war materials to the United States, its position was that the United States should withdraw from Vietnam.

Prime Minister Lester B. Pearson and President Lyndon B. Johnson talk with the media at Camp David in 1965. The day before this picture was taken, Pearson had delivered a speech that questioned the U.S. role in Vietnam.
The Associated Press

The Canadian government did not heavily emphasize this position, because it didn’t want to create a rift with its ally, but in 1965 Pearson gave a speech at Temple University in Pennsylvania in which he suggested it would be best if the United States withdrew. Johnson requested that Pearson come to see him and then tore into Pearson.

Accounts of the meeting vary, in terms of whether Johnson grabbed Pearson by the lapels or not, but he definitely said something like, “don’t come into my room and piss on my rug.”

Pierre Trudeau angered Nixon, Reagan

Pierre Trudeau was the prime minister who incurred the anger of two presidents.

In his youth, Trudeau had visited China in the 1950s, when it was unusual for foreigners to go to the newly communist country, and as prime minister he had a friendly relationship with Cuban leader Fidel Castro, arch-nemesis of American conservatives. Trudeau was regarded by these conservatives — and even some who were not conservative — as a leader who was, at best, soft on communism and, at worst, a fellow traveller.

Richard Nixon, who had been a supporter of U.S. Senator Joseph McCarthy during the latter’s anti-communist crusade of the 1940s and ‘50s, looked on the flashy and long-haired Trudeau with suspicion. It didn’t help that Trudeau gave a speech in the early months of the Nixon administration, claiming the anti-ballistic missile system the United States was developing would threaten world peace.

Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau introduces President Richard Nixon to members of the welcoming line at Ottawa airport on the U.S. president’s 1972 trip to the Canadian capital.
(CP PHOTO/Peter Bregg)

While generally not paying a lot of attention to Canadian-American relations, Nixon was angered when the Trudeau government introduced a motion in Parliament condemning the 1972 renewed bombing of North Vietnam. Nixon continued to have a personal dislike for Trudeau (whom he privately referred to as “that asshole”), but subsequent economic threats by the United States were worked out amicably.

After good relations during the Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter years, another strong anti-communist, Ronald Reagan, took office. Ever the gentleman, Reagan did not engage in public criticism of Trudeau.

Reagan opposed Canada’s NEP

This situation was helped by the fact that Reagan generally did not engage in the development of policy, which could lead to conflicts. However, he listened to those who did and this led to a confrontation over Canada’s National Energy Policy (NEP), introduced shortly before Reagan took office.

Designed to decrease the revenue of (largely American) oil firms and to subsidize exploration by Canadian firms, leading to the Canadianization of the oil industry, the NEP caused an immediate backlash from American firms, which began to withdraw exploration equipment from Canada.

Reagan showed little frustration in public, but confided his feelings to his diary. Combined with the Foreign Investment Review Agency, which screened major purchases of Canadian firms by foreign buyers, the NEP represented to the Reagan administration an anti-American shift in Canadian policy. Relations remained strained until Trudeau left office in 1984.

What distinguishes all of these hostile disagreements from the current one is the very public nature of the disagreement, and the public threat to punish Canada for its prime minister’s rebuke of the American president.

The ConversationThe question is, will this rift prove as transitory as previous ones or will it lead to a prolonged period of political or economic instability in Canadian-American relations?

Ron Stagg, Professor of History, Ryerson University

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

Indigenous Fashion Week Toronto is healing and resurgence in action

File 20180608 191978 1muve93.jpg?ixlib=rb 1.1
Designs by Jeneen Frei Njootli on the runway at the Frost Moon Showcase at Indigenous Fashion Week Toronto last weekend.
(Red Works Photography) 

Riley Kucheran, Ryerson University

Last week, Indigenous people from across Turtle Island and beyond gathered on the traditional territory of the Anishinaabe and Haudenosaunee in Tkaronto for the inaugural Indigenous Fashion Week Toronto (IFWTO).

After decades of smaller endeavours (Chi-Miigwetch to the Elders, forerunners and friends who laid the groundwork), a fully realized IFWTO has come to fruition. Founder and artistic director Sage Paul, along with developmental director Kerry Swanson and producer Heather Haynes, launched a beautiful new festival that centres on community and land.

It was not your typical fashion week.

A slideshow of selected events from Indigenous Fashion Week Toronto.

Signs that Indigenous people do fashion differently appeared early at a preview hosted by the Royal Ontario Museum. Fresh off its installation at a nearby Toronto intersection, Jay Soule (aka Chippewar) hung a sign between two silenced mannequins that asked, “Hey Canada shouldn’t ‘reconciliation’ mean the return of stolen land and honouring the treaties?”

‘I found some electrical tape in a ball on the floor I decided to put an X across their mouth’s to signify Indians in this country being seen and not heard. The way tourism Canada uses Indigenous people as the token marketing tool to the international community. (@chippewar)’
Chippewar/Instagram 

A few days later at a reception hosted by the Lieutenant Governor of Ontario, the thunderous songs and spoken words of Rosary Spence and Tantoo Cardinal reverberated through the halls of Queen’s Park. The scene recalled the disruptive power of a painting by Kent Monkman, who came to talk about his recent collaboration with Jean-Paul Gaultier, a noted cultural appropriator.

Daddies (2016) from Kent Monkman’s Shame and Prejudice: A Story of Resilience.
(Kent Monkman)

Four days of runways

Four days of runway shows were organized around moon phases — New Moon, Berry Moon, Harvest Moon and Frost Moon — which honoured emerging talent, regalia makers, matriarchs and northern designers respectively.

As an Ojibway PhD student studying the role of clothing in colonization, and Indigenous fashion as a mobilizer of cultural and economic resurgence, I was honoured to moderate IWFTO panels and to witness the workshops and runway shows.

Warren Steven Scott look during New Moon.
(Red Works Photography)

All designers put their heart and spirit into their clothing and honoured the past while looking to the future. My personal favourites included: Warren Steven Scott (Nlaka’pamux, Toronto) of Comrags, whose collection is deeply rooted in family and community and pays homage to the clothing of his aunties (who helped with the crochet); and Tania Larsson (Gwich’in/Swedish, Northwest Territories) a founding member of Dene Nahjo, a non-profit organization that focuses on cultural revitalization projects in the North, like urban hide tanning workshops in Yellowknife.

Larsson’s “Protect the Caribou” piece spoke to the interconnectedness of our relations: Without caribou, there is no Indigenous fashion, or food sovereignty or existence itself.

Tania Larsson’s ‘Protect the Caribou’ look from the Frost Moon showcase.
(Red Works Photography) 

Interconnectedness was also a lesson shared in workshops on black walnut dyeing with Carola Jones, and ravenstail weaving from the east led by Meghann O’Brien and Navajo rug weaving from the west led by Barbara Teller Ornelas and her sister Lynda Teller Pete.

Holistic connections

In a panel, Jones and Ornelas discussed the significance of culture, story and process in their practice. We found that common among our Nations is an innovate frugality that comes from a deep respect towards land. Knowledge about plants, growing seasons and sustainable agriculture is at the heart of what makes Indigenous clothing so healing.

Barbara Teller Ornelas and Carola Jones discuss Navajo weaving and black walnut dyeing.
(Red Works Photography) 

This is the brilliance of Indigenous design: It is inherently and holistically sustainable, and intimately connected to a web of human and non-human relations. It is also the significant depth lost when cultural (in)appropriation occurs, the topic of a fiery panel with Jesse Wente, Ariel Smith (Native Women in the Arts) and fashion lawyer Anjli Patel.

Teachings about ethics, roles, responsibilities and values are embedded in Indigenous design processes and lost when appropriated. And unless we fix the radically inequitable power imbalance this will not change.

This panel touched on issues such as institutionalized and normalized cultural theft, the lack of legal protection for Indigenous cultural knowledge, and the role of online social media activism in challenging the fashion industry.

Cultural appropriation is not an issue of intellectual freedom or free speech but of colonization itself, the panel concluded. They then discussed Indigenous sovereignty, solidarity with Black Canadians and revolution.

Indigenous futurisms

Indigenous futurisms and the imaginative power of science fiction was the topic of the last panel with Elwood Jimmy, Jeneen Frei Njootli and Skawennati.

We mused on questions posed by Jarrett Martineau on the electronic episode of CBC’s Reclaimed: “How do you imagine the future? What do you want it to look like? And how do you get there?”

Cultural (In)Appropriation Panel.
(Red Works Photography) 

We discussed what Indigenous design can contribute to a sustainable future that seems increasingly unlikely, what our clothing might look like in the future and how technologies of communication, extraction, and manufacture might be harnessed by Indigenous peoples.

A chance to move forward

As our gathering concluded, the resounding sentiment was that IFWTO felt like imagineNATIVE in its early years. The film and media arts festival, now in its 19th year, is nationally and internationally recognized. This provides much hope for the future of Indigenous fashion in Tkaronto, Turtle Island and beyond.

That the team pulled off such a comprehensive event in a short amount of time is impressive. Even more incredible is that they carved out space for gathering and celebrating our culture, which, as Jesse Wente pointed out, was illegal for nearly 75 years under the Indian Act.

It is so rare that we gather like this. Early settler-Canadian colonizers saw the power in our numbers. When we gather we strategize, mobilize and revolutionize — not to mention socialize! We need to do it more often.

The ConversationThe four days of IFWTO left me exhausted but spiritually nourished. It is a shining star in a beautiful constellation that guides us forward.

Riley Kucheran, PhD Student, Indigenous Advisor, Ryerson University

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

Gender parity and queer awareness needed in mathematics


File 20171109 13351 1xy0l29.jpg?ixlib=rb 1.1
Hidden Figures, the movie, showcased the importance of Black women in mathematics.
(Twentieth Century Fox)

Anthony Bonato, Ryerson University

Equity, diversity and inclusion — EDI — is a trending concept these days. Many institutions now have policies, initiatives and even vice-presidents devoted to EDI — including my own institution, Ryerson University. There is much discussion about how EDI affects productivity and innovation.

Recently, EDI in mathematics was brought to the public discourse. Last month I sat on a panel for EDI in Mathematics at the Fields Institute for Research in Mathematical Sciences. Also, Ryerson Science and the Canadian Science Policy Centre recently released the report: Forging Paths to Enhanced Innovation which I highly recommend you read.

We, unfortunately, have an EDI crisis within mathematics. For example, the average Canadian mathematics department has on average fewer than one-fifth female professors. There are only a handful of gay, bisexual or lesbian mathematics professors in Canada that I know. My own department has only three women faculty out of 21 tenured or tenure-track professors: Our percentage of women math faculty members is only 14 per cent.

A visualization created by the 10 and 3 on mathematics departments in Canada’s universities (2015).
http://www.the10and3.com/where-are-the-women-professors-in-canadas-math-and-science-departments/

I’m a gay mathematician. I’ve faced challenges in my journey to full professor of mathematics and I talk about these challenges when I can. I am hoping to inspire others to do the same.

Up until now, I’ve found the silence on EDI in mathematics, especially on lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans issues, deafening. I had no role models or advocates as I progressed in my academic career. No one talked about EDI in mathematics departments and few professors or students were public about their identities. There are, however, a few vocal advocates for EDI right now, like Dean Imogen Coe at Ryerson. That makes me think we are on the right track.

The landscape in context

To better understand why there are so few LGBTQI2S voices in mathematics, I gathered together some statistics that might shed light. First, to make a broader point, I start with some shocking statistics related to gay youth.

According to Egale, a LGBTQI2S advocacy non-profit, about one-third of LGBTQI2S teens have attempted suicide, compared to seven per cent of youth in the general population. About half of LGBTQI2S teens have considered suicide, and 19 per cent of trans youth had attempted suicide in the previous year. Almost 70 per cent of trans youth reported verbal harassment over their gender identity, and about half of LGBTQI2S teens were harassed over their sexual orientation. One in five LGBTQI2S adolescents were physically assaulted.

Out of 195 countries in the world, homosexuality is criminalized in 72 of them. That’s 38 per cent. Same-sex marriage is a good indicator of a positive environment for LGBTQI2S folks, but only 23 countries (that’s seven per cent) have legalized same-sex marriage. We are all waiting to see the results of the Australian same-sex marriage referendum this week.

One of my undergraduate professors said that mathematics is a byproduct of luxury in a society. People will not do mathematics if they are struggling with other more basic issues like personal safety or acceptance.

It’s tough to encourage youth to study calculus when they are getting beat up for being who they really are. When your government criminalizes your identity, it makes it that much harder to think about number theory.

There are no surveys that I am aware of specifically regarding LGBTQI2S folk in mathematics. None, and it’s 2017. There is only one relevant survey: Queer in STEM, which was a U.S. national survey, published last year in the Journal of Homosexuality and written about last year in Wired magazine.

The survey had 1,400 responses to a 58-page questionnaire and we may glean some interesting things from it. A majority of participants (57 per cent) were out to their colleagues, which is slightly higher than the U.S. workforce at 47 per cent. That’s positive news.

Also, when there was better gender parity in an academic department, participants reported a higher degree of openness. So better EDI in your STEM workplace makes LGBTQI2S folks more open. When there was a higher degree of openness, participants reported a safer and more welcoming environment.

Changing the culture

There are a number of measures we can take to support EDI.

We need an articulated strategy to achieve gender parity in mathematics departments in the not-so-distant future. To do this, we need to pay special attention to academic hiring, which has a lasting impact on departments owing to the long-term nature of tenure. The process — the way in which we do this outreach and hiring – is incredibly important, as are the outcomes for greater diversity.


(Shutterstock)

There must be greater attention to EDI in senior roles such as mathematics department chairs. I did a stint as department chair and encourage my colleagues, especially my women colleagues, to do the same. We also need to see greater diversity in all levels of university administration and in the leadership in professional societies.

There should greater emphasis on EDI in endowed research chairs. Given the poor track record of universities nominating women for Canada Research Chairs, the Government of Canada introduced new measures for greater EDI in these positions. I hope one day there will be endowed chairs in mathematics specifically aimed at LGBTQI2S people. An Alan Turing Chair has a nice ring to it. The same holds for student scholarships both within and outside the university.

We need to work to make sure our LGBTQI2S know they are not alone. They need to know they are just as capable of progressing successfully in mathematics as their heterosexual or cisgendered counterparts.

Mathematics is a difficult subject regardless the context you are working in and we need as many minds as possible to advance the subject. A proof of the Riemann hypothesis is possibly sitting in some transgendered teens brain as I write this. What an incredible tragedy if that proof never comes to fruition.

There are a small set of groups devoted to queers in STEM. Spectra is one group I know of supporting LGBTQI2S folk in mathematics. Other organizations focus more broadly in STEM, such as LGBT STEM, National Organization of Gay and Lesbian Scientists and Technical Professionals and Out in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

Implementing the ideas described in the recent Forging Paths report by Ryerson Science and the Canadian Science Policy Centre, such as changing perceptions and challenging stereotypes within STEM-based professions, would send us in a positive direction.

We have a long way to go, but I am convinced that with collective effort, EDI in mathematics is achievable. We can no longer hide behind claims that mathematics is genderless, racially neutral and independent of LGBTQI2S issues. Mathematics is studied by people, and its application affects people.

Mathematicians need to embrace our diversity as a strength, not as a burden or weakness.

The ConversationDiversity gives new perspectives and challenges the status quo. Isn’t that what mathematicians actually do for a living? We can and we must do this.

Anthony Bonato, Professor of Mathematics, Ryerson University

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

Making space for women at Ryerson

 

Today is International Women’s Day and it is only fitting that we reflect on the place of women within the academy and society in general. Over the decades of my academic career in developing and developed countries, I have seen major advances in the opportunities available to women. It is also encouraging to witness the increasing recognition of the importance of including women in all areas of our social and economic life. Women have embraced these opportunities and have made significant contributions to society; however, we have a long way to go.

Addressing the gender gap has benefits not only for women, but also for other marginalized and underrepresented communities as we move closer toward a more inclusive society.

Today’s world is facing complex challenges, and we need progressive solutions. We must ask ourselves: are we really getting the best talent when we’re leaving half of the talent on the sidelines? Research evidence, by Carnegie Mellon University and cited in Harvard Business Review, shows that women help to raise the collective intelligence of a group. With women at the table, innovation increases, creativity grows, and we create a stronger, more dynamic team of researchers to build solutions that impact lives and communities.

For far too long, the underrepresentation of women in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) fields has been an issue in Canada and elsewhere. With International Women’s Day upon us, equity, diversity and inclusion at Ryerson amongst our faculty and our students are at the forefront of our thoughts.

We are encouraged by the presence of strong women leaders and researchers at Ryerson University. Examples of this innovative thinking is evident every day at Ryerson. Our female researchers are making important contributions, with some of them being our top research grant recipients. Their projects are creating knowledge and generating impactful change in our communities and abroad.

The next generation of female researchers are taking note and are forging ahead. For instance, in our Faculty of Engineering and Architectural Science, young leader Amira Abdelrasoul is carving a path by innovating and creating new solutions for clean drinking water. In Ryerson’s Department of Chemistry and Biology, Stefanie Colombo’s work is showing how climate change is impacting our access to Omega 3 fatty acids from cold-water fish by negatively affecting their food source — algae.

Some students, like Nika Zolfghari, are taking the issue of equity to heart and working on projects like Pitch Black, an initiative that focuses on motivating girls as young as high school age to ensure that they don’t opt out of taking science classes, which could impact their long-term opportunities in STEM fields.

There is no shortage of outstanding women within the walls of our institution. All women need are the opportunities to succeed and make a difference in our world.

 

Photo credit: Gary Beechey

Student researcher demonstrates value of perseverance

Applying knowledge in new ways leads us down the path toward more discoveries. This next blog post highlights one of our promising young researchers. A PhD student at the time of his discovery, and now a sessional instructor at Ryerson, Ali Kamel Al jibouri has been passionate about the environment since childhood. He tells how persistence and perseverance in his research paid off in creating a new method of reclaiming industrial wastewater.

-Usha George, interim vice-president, research and innovation.

Q: Tell us about your interest in reclaiming industrial wastewater. What sparked your passion for this environmental cause?

My interest in reclaiming industrial wastewater began when I was a kid. I was a fan of the Canadian environmentalist David Suzuki. He was a major influence on my now perpetual interest in the issue of industrial wastewater treatment. Guided by the inspiration that Suzuki provided, I enrolled in a Master of Science in Chemical Engineering at the University of Baghdad- Iraq. My first chance to work in the industrial wastewater field started when the Ministry of Environment approached the university with a problem they could not solve: high levels of chloride and sulfate ion concentrations being discharged into the Tigris River from an industrial plant. I was enlisted to head up the investigation. I led a team that designed, manufactured, and installed electrodes to control the addition of oxidizing and reducing agents in the industrial electroplating wastewater treatment plant. We were able to reduce the concentrations of chloride and sulfate ions in the effluent to permissible levels.

This was my first experience with the thrill of having an outcome that had a significant impact on the environment. It was also the first time I understood the role that a researcher plays in the community of experts working to solve environmental issues.

When I began my PhD studies at Ryerson, it was natural for me to pursue my interest in industrial wastewater. My passion for the issue was consistent with the priorities of my new academic home. At Ryerson, research is driven by a commitment to discovering innovative solutions to pressing problems.

Q: Can you tell us about the moment of discovery when you realized your process was sound and you achieved the intended results?

Guided by my supervisor, Dr. Jianging Wu, and the chair of the Department of Chemical Engineering, Dr. Simant Upreti, I undertook a line of inquiry that had never been pursued: the development of a novel optimal control of a continuous advanced oxidation process to minimize its operating cost. This kind of research has none of the “aha” moments that dominate popular imagination. Instead, it involves grinding it out, day after day, until you discover the appropriate kinetic parameters, modeling, simulation and optimal control.

We realized the impact of our findings when Environment Canada contacted us and told us that they decided to feature our process in the national technology matrix for the treatment of oil sands wastewaters. Environment Canada has also showed an interest in applying our technology to several controlled sites across Canada where non-biodegradable pollutants need to be treated. This outcome is what every researcher hopes for: the discovery of a novel and useful solution to a major problem that gets picked up by leaders in the field.

Q: Your research will have the potential to have great environmental impact. Can you talk about how you see your role as a researcher in effecting change in the world?

When I first became a researcher, I didn’t fully appreciate that my work was much more than something I was interested in pursuing. Now I have a deeper understanding that environmental challenges can be overcome when researchers and leaders help each other achieve and implement novel solutions. Innovation is a shared process. From David Suzuki to government agencies, and Ryerson University, we are all engaged in a joint initiative to address these environmental issues.

 

Amplifying your research through peer collaboration

 

Collaboration is one of the cornerstones of Ryerson’s success.

As we continue to see research funding dollars grow, while as a whole funding for post-secondary research is slowing, we have to look at the reasons why we continue to see success.

Our accomplishments mean that Ryerson is now recognized as a comprehensive university by Research Infosource. Our increased funding in graduate and post-graduate research makes Ryerson a preferred collaborator with many industry partners.

We must continue to draw on our strengths. At the recent SRC networking event, we heard from some collaborators about how Ryerson’s uniquely poised for cross-disciplinary efforts.

Professor Alan Fung discussed some of his own collaborations with peers at Ryerson. “Collaborations between professors are not a problem because of the culture here at Ryerson,” said professor of mechanical engineering, Alan Fung. “We don’t have the traditional structures of other universities.”

Fung has worked on projects with professor Phil Walsh in the entrepreneurship and management department at the Ted Rogers School of management. Together they tackled a training program for energy auditors of industrial facilities. Now they are working on building a net-zero home powered entirely by solar power.

Ryerson’s research institutes and labs can serve as a meeting space for researchers with similar interests as we heard from Walsh.

“The Centre for Urban Energy is a great place for us to aggregate,” said Walsh.  Prior to the establishment of CUE, professors interested in sustainability would occasionally host workshops, but rarely did they follow up. “The innovation and entrepreneurship space is key component of the centre. You start to realize your passions and things that are important to you and next thing you know you are working in teams,” he added.

Our funding partners value collaboration, both intra and inter institutional. Our industry partners look at proposals with an eye for who can offer them the most comprehensive solutions for their challenges.

When we combine the technical skills of a researcher with the business acumen of another, you get a winning combination. Businesses can see not only how their problems can be solved but how they can be applied to benefit their bottom line.

When our professors reach out to other faculties to help them solve problems they add a whole other dimension to their research. According to Anatoliy Gruzd from the Social Media Lab, collaboration has create opportunities for more resources, access to other equipment, as well as access to students who can help move the projects forward.

“Most of the projects I am working on, even the ones where I am the only principal investigator, have collaborators,” said Gruzd, adding how his lab often draws international collaborators. “A lot of international scholars are interested in collaboration with us because of the social media lab,” said Gruzd. “It increases our productivity in terms of publications and our capacity to train students.”

As you can see the benefits of collaborating are many.  OVPRI is happy to assist with any collaborative efforts between faculty members, and industry partners. Let us know how we can help.

11-03-16-src-networking-67
The panel discusses the benefits of collaboration.
11-03-16-src-networking-59
Anatoliy Gruzd (Social Media) explains how sharing resources can help further research and how collaborations with students can sometimes be a more flexible solution.
11-03-16-src-networking-51
Attendees at the SRC Networking evening listen intently to the panel.
11-03-16-src-networking-32
Usha George reminds the crowd of how collaboration is one of Ryerson’s greatest strengths.

 

What does a virus have in common with a terrorist cell? It’s all in the math.

As we showcase the variety of research and creative activities being undertaken at Ryerson, we thought it essential to let some of the researchers do the talking. They are the experts, after all. Our first guest blogger is Anthony Bonato, professor of mathematics. ~Interim Vice-President, Research and Innovation, Usha George

 

abonato

Q1. Tell us about your research:

I study networks: think of dots and lines representing the connections between them. Networks arise in all disciplines, and occur throughout the natural, social and technological worlds. I develop mathematical models for these so-called complex networks that predict their evolution and uncover their underlying mechanisms.

My most recent work is on the mining and modelling of networks of cultural works such novels and films. Our research team mapped out the community structure and central characters in the Harry Potter and Dune novels—all without reading a page! The aim is to use network science, machine-learning algorithms, and big data to uncover new phenomena in these texts.

I’m fascinated by dynamic properties in networks such as the spread of social contagion or memes. A doctoral student developed a new theory called graph burning. The burning number of a network gives a measure of how fast a fire (which plays the role of a meme) can spread in a network.

Q2. What drives your passion for your research?

My passion for mathematics began in high school, and fully ignited in university. I remember the first theorem I proved almost twenty years ago: it answered an esoteric sounding question on continuum-many universal Horn classes of bounded chromatic number. Looking back, it was a small result, but it was my first!

Curiosity and a love of my subject drive me forward. Research isn’t work when you love what you do. Many times in mathematical research, you don’t succeed answering the problems you initially asked. However, when things work it’s truly magical. Our publications capture those times when things worked, and I’ve been lucky to have over 100 publications in many areas of network science and graph theory.

Q3. Tell us about the impact of your research?

 My work on the geometry of social networks is, for the first time, quantifying a construct in the social sciences called Blau space. Applications of our work on biologically central proteins may eventually lead to the development of new therapeutic regimes for diseases like cancer. Another application of my work is to network interdiction, which focuses on the monitoring or disruption of intruders on a network. Think of stopping a virus spreading in a population or disrupting a terrorist cell.

I’ve been lucky to speak at international conferences in places like India and China. My most recent talk was a keynote lecture at Oxford University, where I spoke to an interdisciplinary audience containing mathematicians, physicists and engineers.

I love writing, and my blog focuses on my research and mathematics in pop culture. In just over a year, I’m proud that the blog has thirty thousand views. As another creative outlet, I’m writing science fiction. My short stories are live on Wattpad, and I am releasing a novel called Pattern Earth in 2017. In the book, a 16-year-old mathematics prodigy discovers a mathematical proof that triggers an alien invasion. How refreshing is it to have heroine be a mathematician for a change?

 

 

Transforming lives through knowledge creation

Vice-President Research and Innovation, Usha George speaks at Ryerson's New Faculty Orientation. (top right) Sarah Sabatinos and Josephine Wong share a laugh during the panel discussion. (bottom right) Julia Spaniol looks on as Alison Matthews David shares her insight with the audience.
Vice-President Research and Innovation, Usha George speaks at Ryerson’s New Faculty Orientation. (top right) Sarah Sabatinos and Josephine Wong share a laugh during the panel discussion. (bottom right) Julia Spaniol looks on as Alison Matthews David shares her insight with the audience.

In a room filled with the eagerness and excitement of new Ryerson professors, during the recent new faculty orientation, I was reminded of the privilege of an academic career. I was struck by the opportunity that lies ahead for not only the researchers in the room but also for the many lives and communities that will experience the impact of their future work.

I remembered my first year as a pre-tenure faculty member at the Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto. As a relative newcomer to Canada, I was excited to have the opportunity to work in a university setting, as I had before I immigrated. I loved working with students and getting them engaged in the learning process. Research was integral to that engagement.

The focus of my scholarship was/is newcomer settlement and integration. As a graduate student in Chicago, I was very intrigued by how immigrant communities tried to blend their identities into their adopted identities. In spite of the common “melting pot” perception ascribed to American society, it was clear to me that immigrants embraced hybrid identities.

Later, in Canada, I studied the challenges that came with high levels of immigration during the 1990s with newcomer settlement concentrated in Toronto (almost 40 per cent settled in the Greater Toronto Area). The introduction of the point system for immigration removed racial discrimination from the selection process and introduced tremendous diversity among the newcomers arriving in Canada. The federal department of Citizenship and Immigration was interested in understanding the challenges related to settlement of the different communities in order to create programs to respond to the needs of newcomers. I completed a number of studies with new immigrant groups from various countries such as Iraq, former Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Mainland China and several African countries.

As I concluded a number of these ‘needs’ studies, I came to the realization that the settlement needs of all newcomers were similar— all needed:
•    gainful employment,
•    housing,
•    language training,
•    information about available services
•    and social connections.

What was unique about each group was the language and cultural background and their pre-immigration experiences.  Based on this newly created knowledge , and the proposal for a model of settlement service delivery that followed, my research informed policy and practice as new programs were introduced in some Ontario cities to the benefit of the newcomers. As I evaluated some of these programs, I was able to see the application and impact of my research.

From studies on settlement and organizational practices that create barriers to settlement, I have moved on to studies on integration of newcomers to Canadian society. Currently, I am working on a study of the citizenship experience of racialized women.

Seeing the transformative effect of scholarly research continues to inspire my work. It was clear to me at the new faculty orientation that the excitement of creating knowledge is still alive, and I look forward to sharing in the passionate endeavours of our new researchers.

Creating knowledge and fostering creativity

ushageorge-1by Usha George, Interim Vice-President, Research & Innovation

Ryerson’s academic plan has set out a distinct path for growth—with one of its key components defined as increasing the excellence, intensity and impact of our scholarly, research and creative (SRC) activities.

At Ryerson, we believe in a broad and inclusive definition of research. We value basic and applied research while also placing importance on creative activities such as exhibitions, theatrical performances and other creative works. Our faculty members have the opportunity to choose from a wide range of research areas, as long as their research program meets the standards of ethics review, falls within the mandate of the university, and promotes public good.

An essential component of a faculty member’s work at Ryerson, research is central to our growing reputation. It fosters a culture of innovation and creativity. Ryerson prides itself on being a community-engaged university, and a city builder. We want to address real-world problems by responding to societal needs and contributing to the technological, cultural, social and economic well-being of society.

Research also helps us as academics. Through research, we stay current, infusing fresh materials in the courses we teach. The very act of creating knowledge is exciting. It gives us a sense of accomplishment and mastery. Sharing one’s research with students provides them with the opportunity to experience the thrills and challenges of creating knowledge, generating the kind of engagement and exceptional experiences we strive to achieve at Ryerson for our students. Moreover, as researchers we also benefit from student perspectives; in particular, our graduate students are bringing a fresh perspective to our high-level research.

In professional disciplines, research provides us with evidence to inform policy and practice. The integral relationship between theory, research and practice has been well established. Knowledge translation and mobilization of our research creates that important link between research and application by disseminating the newly created knowledge and engaging the end users.

Application is crucial to closing the innovation loop—it breaks down silos and brings us into our communities, where we see the real impact of our work as we continue to create knowledge and build solid relationships that strengthen our position as an engaged, innovative institution.